Animal rights office blasts DA on pigeon shoot ciatations

I honestly don't understand how anyone could justify pigeon shoots by saying they do not fit in the 'cruelty to animals' category.

I can't understand that either. Or the DA's suggestion to 'hold the pigeon shoots in places not accessible to the public'. Out of sight, out of mind, he thinks. It's disgraceful.
There is no mention either of the SHARK's member who was shot during the pigeon shoot. Surely, even for pigeon-haters, that should be illegal...

Teresa wrote:

I can't understand that either.

Or the DA's suggestion to 'hold the pigeon shoots in places not accessible to the public'.
Out of sight, out of mind, he thinks. It's disgraceful.
There is no mention either of the SHARK's member who was shot during the pigeon shoot. Surely, even for pigeon-haters, that should be illegal...

I meant to touch on that as well.
You're exactly right. It's a down right disgrace.

I feel the urge coming on to get my ready.

Teresa wrote:

I can't understand that either. Or the DA's suggestion to 'hold the pigeon shoots in places not accessible to the public'. Out of sight, out of mind, he thinks. It's disgraceful.

There is no mention either of the SHARK's member who was shot during the pigeon shoot.
Surely, even for pigeon-haters, that should be illegal...

You would think.

Pretty unbelieveable...all of it. Got to wonder what planet he dropped off. My have hurt his head in the fall.